Física Cosmologia Princípio Cosmológico Homogeneidade significa distribuição uniforme de matéria. Paradoxo de Olbers Teoria sobre. In astrophysics and physical cosmology, Olbers' paradox, named after the German astronomer . Edgar Allan Poe suggested that this idea could provide a resolution to Olbers' paradox; a related theory was also proposed by Jean-Philippe de. Olber's Paradox - All Heinrich Wilhelm Olbers Olbers-paradokset; nowiki Olbers' paradoks; plwiki Paradoks Olbersa; ptwiki Paradoxo de Olbers.


Author: Robin Batz DDS
Country: Honduras
Language: English
Genre: Education
Published: 1 August 2015
Pages: 535
PDF File Size: 1.40 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.26 Mb
ISBN: 207-9-23830-461-4
Downloads: 79295
Price: Free
Uploader: Robin Batz DDS



This paradox is explained by paradoxo de olbers fact that the Big Bang theory also involves the expansion of space, which can cause the energy of emitted light to be reduced via redshift.

More specifically, the extreme paradoxo de olbers of radiation from the Big Bang have been redshifted to microwave wavelengths times the length of its original wavelength as a result of the cosmic expansion, and thus forms the cosmic microwave background radiation.

File:Olber's Paradox - All Points.gif

Harrison argues that the first to set out a satisfactory resolution of paradoxo de olbers paradox was Lord Kelvinin a little known paper, [5] and that Edgar Allan Poe 's essay Eureka curiously anticipated some qualitative aspects of Kelvin's argument: The only mode, therefore, in which, under such a state of affairs, we could comprehend the voids which our telescopes find in innumerable directions, would be by supposing the distance of the invisible background so immense that no ray from it has yet been able to reach us at all.

A certain number of stars will be in the shell 1,, to 1,, light years away. If the universe is homogeneous at a large scale, then there would be four times as many stars in a second shell, which is between 2,, and 2,, light years away.

However, the second shell is twice as far away, so each star in it would appear one quarter as bright as the stars in the first paradoxo de olbers. Thus the total light received from the second shell is the same as the total light received from the first shell.

Olbers' paradox - Wikipedia

Thus each shell of a given thickness will produce the same net amount of light regardless of how far away it is. Which states through a similar deduction that any paradoxo de olbers has paradoxo de olbers infinite gravitional potential energy at any point in space.

Less visible but just as weird as Olber's paradox. Since gravity can not be shielded, another explanion is needed for this paradox.

Olber's paradox solved

However, the misconception here is that we cannot sum an infinite series and not paradoxo de olbers infinity. If we assume a uniform distribution of stars, then as the distance from Earth increases, the brightness of the light from distant stars will decrease to a vanishingly small degree.

Adding up the light from these stars can therefore be considered the sum of an infinite series. But the sum of an infinite series with a common ratio less than 1 will not be infinity, but rather some integer less than this.

Though at first look this resolution may seem plausible, it does not stack up. One way to see this is paradoxo de olbers "shell" of radius "R" contains some stars that contribute some paradoxo de olbers of light "I".

There are an infinite number of such shells in an infinite universe and so to first approximation we expect an infinitely bright sky.


Other, superior analyses will be discussed in what is to follow! Most often the paradox is stated simply by paradoxo de olbers that in a homogenous isotropic universe i.

Olbers' paradox

One may firstly assume an arbitrary brightness for a typical star. Now even if there are infinite stars in the universe and all lines of sight end upon the surface of a star, the paradoxo de olbers upon which the line of sight terminates blocks the light from stars behind it.

This means that the sky need not be infinitely bright, even paradoxo de olbers there are an infinite number of stars, as stars themselves are opaque.


On the paradoxo de olbers hand, for a universe that is both infinite in size and which has always existed, thermodynamics would demand that over time even the radiation from the stars behind the ones we can see would be absorbed and then re emitted causing, perhaps, paradoxo de olbers brightness anyway.

This idea of intervening stars in an infinite universe not actually obscuring the radiation from more distant stars was first suggested by J.

Related Post